guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#state-of-mayflower-v-competentcini
This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-competentcini channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:16 a.m.
Clark County District Court online systems
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-18 12:17 a.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @Reapers to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:17 a.m.
@Reapers Please send the CI and AOPC
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:17 a.m.
PDF
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:25 a.m.
That was fast
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:25 a.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:26 a.m.
Why is it a criminal complaint
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Why is it a criminal complaint
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:26 a.m.
criminal complaint?
ReapersReapers
criminal complaint?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:27 a.m.
Did you write this or did someone make you write it like this
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:27 a.m.
It's horrible
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:27 a.m.
Oh my apologies, it was my paralegal
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:27 a.m.
For second-degree murder, who is "the person"?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:27 a.m.
Count Two
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:28 a.m.
@Reapers
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:28 a.m.
A peace officer?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
A peace officer?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:29 a.m.
No, that was a person detained in cuffs by a peace officer
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:29 a.m.
Ok. And what about the AOPC?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Ok. And what about the AOPC?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:31 a.m.
ReapersReapers
Click to see attachment.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:33 a.m.
I hate this
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:33 a.m.
Format and the content
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:34 a.m.
Is Count One a general attempted murder charge? As in, you are alleging that he attempted to kill multiple officers in one count?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Is Count One a general attempted murder charge? As in, you are alleging that he attempted to kill multiple officers in one count?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:35 a.m.
No, I only allege attempted murder on one officer
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:35 a.m.
I wouldn't do that
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:35 a.m.
I would do what I said
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:35 a.m.
Like more broadly
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
I would do what I said
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:37 a.m.
As in allege an attempt to kill multiple officers?
ReapersReapers
As in allege an attempt to kill multiple officers?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:50 a.m.
Yes
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 12:50 a.m.
Was Cini the driver of the vehicle?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:53 a.m.
Cini appears to be the driver of the blue crusader, who got hit by the unmarked police car as he got out of his car. The officers arrested the driver of the green van and cini proceeded to kill the driver of the green van, along with shooting the officer who was performing the arrest
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 12:56 a.m.
Actually, the black car who hit him does not look like police car
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:11 a.m.
COUNT ONE
(FIRST-DEGREE MURDER):
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about March 26, 2025, with intent to cause the death of another person, caused the death of John Doe, with premeditation.

COUNT TWO (Lesser Included Offense)
(SECOND-DEGREE MURDER):
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about March 26, 2025, with intent to cause the death of another person, caused the death of John Doe.

COUNT THREE
(ATTEMPTED MURDER):
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about March 26, 2025, with intent to cause the death of a peace officer, took a substantial step toward causing the death of said peace officer.

COUNT FOUR
(ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON):
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about March 26, 2025, did unlawfully and maliciously assault a peace officer with a firearm, an object capable of causing severe harm.

COUNT FIVE
(OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE):
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about March 26, 2025, did knowingly flee from a peace officer while endangering the lives of others.

COUNT SIX
(OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE):
The defendant, in the County of Clark, on or about March 26, 2025, did unlawfully hinder or interfere with a peace officer in the lawful execution of their duties by discharging a firearm and impeding the lawful arrest of a suspect.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:11 a.m.
@Reapers This is what you could have charged but you didn't
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:11 a.m.
COUNT ONE – First-Degree Murder
COUNT TWO – Second-Degree Murder (Lesser Included)
COUNT THREE – Attempted Murder
COUNT FOUR – Assault with a Deadly Weapon
COUNT FIVE – Obstruction (Evasion)
COUNT SIX – Obstruction (Interference with Arrest)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:11 a.m.
I am a little confused by the restraint
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:12 a.m.
Is this a prosecutorial policy? @Reapers
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:12 a.m.
A new policy?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
I am a little confused by the restraint
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 01:17 a.m.
We usually stick to the charges mentioned on the aopc but I have learned that it is a mistake to do so
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:18 a.m.
You are welcome to go outside their recommended charges
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 01:18 a.m.
they miss most charges and it might end up being counterproductive to add a charge in the information where the language for that charge is not written on the aopc
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:18 a.m.
The substance of the affidavit is what's more important
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:18 a.m.
As in, the textual reccounting of the offense
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:19 a.m.
Their recommendations don't really mean much to me
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:19 a.m.
Plus, you, as a prosecutor, have the discretion at the end of the day
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:19 a.m.
An AOPC is only a tool for me to decide whether to proceed with the case
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:19 a.m.
I can certainly find that outside charges are welcome if the substance of the affidavit aligns with it
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 01:20 a.m.
I will file an amended information tomorrow in the day
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 01:21 a.m.
as for the format, you said you didn’t like this new format?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 01:21 a.m.
I had a few cases held up for a couple of weeks because the judges didn’t like the previous format so we switched to this one
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:23 a.m.
I have a lot of things I'd like to say about the other judges
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:23 a.m.
But I will not
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:23 a.m.
The format you used was acceptable however it said complaint not information
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 01:24 a.m.
That's not to say I like the format
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
The format you used was acceptable however it said complaint not information
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 01:24 a.m.
I will fire my paralegal @Dun.. for this error(edited)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 07:45 p.m.
@Reapers
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 08:01 p.m.
I'm on this now, I was dealing with another case
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Reapers
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-18 08:32 p.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @CompetentCini(edited)
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-18 08:32 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @CompetentCini to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:33 p.m.
@CompetentCini Before we proceed, I must ensure you understand your rights in this matter:

1. You have the right to remain silent. This means you do not have to speak or provide any information that could incriminate you.

2. You also have the right to have an attorney present during any questioning or legal proceedings. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no cost.

3. You have the right to a fair and public trial, where evidence will be presented, and witnesses can be called to testify on your behalf.

4. Furthermore, you have the right to confront witnesses against you, meaning you can question them in court.

5. Finally, you have the right to appeal any conviction or sentence imposed upon you.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:33 p.m.
You are charged in the information as follows:

COUNT 1
1 M.S.C. § 2101 —FIRST-DEGREE MURDER (FELONY)
On or about the 26th of March 2025, within the County of Clark, the defendant with
intent to cause the death of another person and with malice, caused the death of Uhtraed, with
premeditation..
COUNT 2
1 M.S.C. § 2102 —SECOND DEGREE MURDER (FELONY)
On or about the 26th of March 2025, within the County of Clark, the defendant with
intent to cause the death of another person, caused the death of Uhtraed.
COUNT 3
1 M.S.C. § 2301 —ATTEMPTED MURDER (FELONY)
On or about the 26th of March 2025, within the County of Clark, the defendant with
intent to cause the death of a peace officer, took a substantial step towards causing the death of
said peace officer.
COUNT 4
1 M.S.C. § 2303 —AGGRAVATED BATTERY (FELONY)
On or about the 26th of March 2025, within the County of Clark, the defendant
discharged a Benneti 17 model pistol at a peace officer, willfully and maliciously striking him
with the firearm.
COUNT 5
1 M.S.C. § 2302 —ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON (FELONY)
On or about the 26th of March 2025, within the County of Clark, the defendant did
unlawfully and maliciously assault a peace officer, by firing a pistol in the direction of said
officer.
COUNT 6
1 M.S.C. § 1312 —OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (FELONY)
On or about the 26th of March 2025, within the County of Clark, the defendant did
unlawfully hinder a peace officer from carrying out their duties, to wit, by shooting in the
direction of the peace officer and impeding the lawful arrest of Uhtraed.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
You are charged in the information as follows: COUNT 1 1 M.S.C. § 2101 —FIRST-DEGREE MURDER (FELONY) On or about the 26th of March 2025, within the County of Clark, the defe...
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:33 p.m.
@CompetentCini How do you plead as to Count One, First-Degree Murder?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:33 p.m.
@CompetentCini How do you plead as to Count Two, Second-Degree Murder?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:34 p.m.
@CompetentCini How do you plead as to Count Three, Attempted Murder?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:34 p.m.
@CompetentCini How do you plead as to Count Four, Aggravated Battery?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:34 p.m.
@CompetentCini How do you plead as to Count Five, Assault With a Deadly Weapon?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:34 p.m.
@CompetentCini How do you plead as to Count Six, Obstruction of Justice?
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-18 08:35 p.m.
Could I add my lawyer here?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:35 p.m.
Who is he
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-18 08:35 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @huddy. to the case channel.
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-18 08:35 p.m.
@huddy.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:35 p.m.
@CompetentCini Okay, please reply to each of those messages and enter a plea
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:36 p.m.
Guilty, Not Guilty, or Nolo Contendere
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-18 08:36 p.m.
Ill respond shortly after i speak with my lawyer
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:36 p.m.
@Reapers Also I was going to say that aggravated battery is a strange offense to charge
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:37 p.m.
In this case
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:37 p.m.
The CI makes it seems like he physically walked over with the firearm and pistol-whipped the peace officer with it
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:37 p.m.
Battery is understood as physical contact
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:38 p.m.
Do whatever you want
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:38 p.m.
Be strange
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-18 08:47 p.m.
@meowiitten add @sinz i have 2 lawyers
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-18 08:48 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @sinz to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:49 p.m.
@sinz
CompetentCiniCompetentCini
Ill respond shortly after i speak with my lawyer
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:56 p.m.
How much time do you need?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 08:56 p.m.
If it's more than an hour I'm just going to enter a plea of not guilty and you can change your plea at any time
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
If it's more than an hour I'm just going to enter a plea of not guilty and you can change your plea at any time
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-18 08:57 p.m.
Sorry speaking with one of my lawyers but most likely this will happen not to sure yet.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Reapers Also I was going to say that aggravated battery is a strange offense to charge
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 08:59 p.m.
I agree the wording for aggravated battery on the MSC is not ideal, but the law says "touches another with an object capable of causing severe harm"
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 08:59 p.m.
if the defendant fired a bullet at the victim and it landed, then I believe he has touched another with an object capable of causing severe harm, which would be the bullet coming out of the firearm
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:00 p.m.
Battery
ReapersReapers
if the defendant fired a bullet at the victim and it landed, then I believe he has touched another with an object capable of causing severe harm, which would be the bullet coming o...
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:01 p.m.
Battery is still understood as physical contact
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:01 p.m.
Assault would be more fitting
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:01 p.m.
If you want to think of something to distinguish the two, just think of a battering ram
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 09:03 p.m.
I don't quite like assault because according to the MSC, it's "an attempt to cause harm or the causing of reasonable fear that the victim will be touched or harmed"
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:03 p.m.
Actually, eh
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:03 p.m.
I am inclined to agree after reading the statute on battery
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 09:03 p.m.
by firing the bullet and it touching the victim, it's no longer an attempt or a reasonable fear, it has transcended beyond that point(edited)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:04 p.m.
Assault = the anticipation of being hit by the bullet
Battery = actually being hit with the bullet
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:04 p.m.
So I agree with you
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 09:04 p.m.
Yes, exactly, in this case, assault would be the lesser included charge
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-18 09:04 p.m.
if the court finds that the bullet did not land on the victim
sinz
sinz 2025-04-18 09:05 p.m.
not guilty all counts
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:08 p.m.
MINUTE ENTRY: Return on Summons/Initial Appearance/Arraignment as to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 held on 05/18/2025. COMPETENTCINI appeared with counsel. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered as to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. (Entered: 04/18/2025)
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:10 p.m.
PAPERLESS BRADY ORDER: It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court confirms the State's obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence—namely, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the State's case—as required by the principles established in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. The State is hereby ORDERED to fulfill this obligation. The State has a duty to disclose any evidence that negates the defendant's guilt, affects the credibility of a witness, or could potentially reduce a sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without needing to make a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, dismissal of the information, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. Signed by District Judge sadoimpacto (SJI) (Entered: 04/18/2025)
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-18 09:10 p.m.
PAPERLESS STANDING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY ORDER: All parties are ordered to adhere to the following pretrial timelines. The pretrial window will close ten (10) days from April 18, 2025, concluding on April 28, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay. By April 23, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST, all parties must disclose a final draft of their exhibit lists and witness lists. Additionally, all motions in limine must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours before the trial, with any oppositions due twenty-four (24) hours following the filing of such motions. Trial briefs, if any, are to be submitted no later than forty-eight (48) hours before the trial. Signed by District Judge sadoimpacto (SJI) (Entered: 04/18/2025)
@huddy. @sinz @Reapers
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-19 05:23 p.m.
@huddy. @sinz @Reapers I remind all parties that if you submit discovery early, and wish to proceed to scheduling a date and time for trial, we can proceed like that
sinz
sinz 2025-04-19 05:27 p.m.
Mr. competent has informed me that he actually does not need an additional lawyer
sinz
sinz 2025-04-19 05:27 p.m.
you can remove me
sinzsinz
Mr. competent has informed me that he actually does not need an additional lawyer
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-19 05:28 p.m.
Are you moving to withdraw?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Are you moving to withdraw?
sinz
sinz 2025-04-19 05:29 p.m.
If the court will accept the verbal request yes
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-19 05:29 p.m.
Okay. Withdrawn
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-19 05:29 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @sinz from the case channel.
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-23 07:07 p.m.
@meowiitten @huddy.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-25 11:37 p.m.
@huddy. Do you not intend to present any exhibits or call witnesses?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-26 07:41 p.m.
SCHEDULING ORDER: This matter is set for trial on April 29, 2025, at 5:00 PM Eastern Time, to be conducted asynchronously.
@huddy. @Reapers
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-26 10:31 p.m.
Sounds good
huddy.
huddy. 2025-04-27 04:52 a.m.
Sounds good
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-29 05:22 p.m.
Is this going to start anytime soon @meowiitten @Reapers @huddy.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-29 05:23 p.m.
@Reapers OS
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-29 05:23 p.m.
I rule we dismiss the case
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-29 09:18 p.m.
So what now?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-29 10:22 p.m.
@Reapers
CompetentCiniCompetentCini
I rule we dismiss the case
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-29 10:23 p.m.
Can you stop talking?
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-04-29 10:44 p.m.
Apologies
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-29 11:22 p.m.
Good evening, your honor, and may it please the court;
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-29 11:32 p.m.
Today, the State comes to seek justice against this man who prevented justice from occurring on the 26th of March. To prevent justice from occurring, the defendant murdered a man who was apprehended by law enforcement and detained. Premeditation will be a key element in this case to determine whether the defendant is guilty of first or second-degree murder. After murdering Uhtraed, who was the man in police custody, the defendant continued firing at the officer who was detaining him. If evidence shows that a bullet landed on the officer, then he would have battered that officer with an aggravated weapon. If a bullet did not, it would be assault with a deadly weapon. The State also believes that the defendant intended to murder that officer and obviously took a big step towards accomplishing that objective. Lastly, the prosecution intends to prove that by murdering the man who was in police custody, the defendant intended and did commit obstruction of justice. Thank you, your honor. I yield as a humble Esq. prosecutor to the defense.
Reapers
Reapers 2025-04-29 11:33 p.m.
@meowiitten @huddy.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-29 11:33 p.m.
@huddy. Proceed
huddy.
huddy. 2025-04-30 04:22 p.m.
In morning
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-03 11:51 a.m.
@huddy. ?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-04 11:10 a.m.
Okay I guess it’s waived?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-04 11:10 a.m.
@Reapers Call your first witness
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-04 11:11 a.m.
@huddy. are you able to give one or will you waive(edited)
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-04 11:11 a.m.
Writing rn, sorry for the wait, home in 2 mins
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Reapers Call your first witness
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-04 12:38 p.m.
I call @Brandon
huddy.huddy.
Writing rn, sorry for the wait, home in 2 mins
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-04 12:38 p.m.
You have an hour
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-04 12:38 p.m.
From this moment
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-04 12:38 p.m.
Since we're already over 24 hours
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-04 01:01 p.m.
Your Honor, the evidence will show that on March 26th, 2025, my client acted not with premeditated intent or malice, but out of genuine and immediate fear for his life in the chaotic situation he was in. You will hear testimony and see facts that support the reality that my client believed he was in danger. This was not the calculated act of a cold-blooded killer, it was a panicked reaction from someone who was cornered by individuals he was unaware were law enforcement officers, and believed were trying to kill him.
My client did not seek out violence but acted in what he perceived as necessary self-preservation. At the conclusion of this trial, we are confident you will see that these crimes were not crimes of intent, but of fear.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-04 01:18 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @Brandon to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-04 01:18 p.m.
@Brandon Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:19 p.m.
I do
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:19 p.m.
@meowiitten
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-04 01:22 p.m.
@Reapers Proceed
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-04 01:27 p.m.
@Brandon Where were you on March 26th?
ReapersReapers
@Brandon Where were you on March 26th?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:47 p.m.
On March 26th I was in Clark County engaged in a pursuit on a green lodger courier industrial driven by Uhtraed with other law enforcement.
BrandonBrandon
On March 26th I was in Clark County engaged in a pursuit on a green lodger courier industrial driven by Uhtraed with other law enforcement.
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-04 02:09 p.m.
What was the reason of the pursuit
ReapersReapers
What was the reason of the pursuit
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:13 p.m.
The suspect Uhtraed was being pulled over and instead of pulling over decided to evade police.
BrandonBrandon
The suspect Uhtraed was being pulled over and instead of pulling over decided to evade police.
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-04 02:31 p.m.
Did you arrest Uhtraed?
ReapersReapers
Did you arrest Uhtraed?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 10:02 p.m.
No, no law enforcement officer on the scene was able to due to the defendant killing Uhtraed after he was detained.
BrandonBrandon
No, no law enforcement officer on the scene was able to due to the defendant killing Uhtraed after he was detained.
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-04 10:23 p.m.
Was CompetentCini perhaps in danger and acting in self defense?
ReapersReapers
Was CompetentCini perhaps in danger and acting in self defense?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 11:41 p.m.
No, not at all. The situation was completely under control and safe after we had detained Uhtraed . Lights and sirens were being used on all cars that were in the pursuit of Uhtraed, so it was clear that we were law enforcement chasing a suspect. Not to mention there was a marked car as well. Nobody posed a threat to CompetentCini at all. The defendant was a good distance away from where we detained Uhtraed as well, and still proceeded to reload his firearm and shoot Uhtraed, killing him.
BrandonBrandon
No, not at all. The situation was completely under control and safe after we had detained Uhtraed . Lights and sirens were being used on all cars that were in the pursuit of Uhtra...
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:03 a.m.
Then why would CompetentCini kill a person in police custody?
ReapersReapers
Then why would CompetentCini kill a person in police custody?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 12:09 a.m.
In my opinion I feel he was trying to save Uhtraed from being arrested, something criminals do often.
BrandonBrandon
In my opinion I feel he was trying to save Uhtraed from being arrested, something criminals do often.
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:11 a.m.
Are you saying he hindered law enforcement from carrying out their official duties or what are you implying?
ReapersReapers
Are you saying he hindered law enforcement from carrying out their official duties or what are you implying?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 01:00 a.m.
Yes , he hindered law enforcement carrying out their official duties
BrandonBrandon
Yes , he hindered law enforcement carrying out their official duties
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:07 a.m.
Where did law enforcement apprehend Uhtraed?
ReapersReapers
Where did law enforcement apprehend Uhtraed?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 02:09 a.m.
At Woodbury fields I believe it is called
BrandonBrandon
At Woodbury fields I believe it is called
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:12 a.m.
Woodbury fields? That’s quite far from the city.. did Competent perhaps get lost or was he following the pursuit?
ReapersReapers
Woodbury fields? That’s quite far from the city.. did Competent perhaps get lost or was he following the pursuit?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 02:16 a.m.
I don’t know if he was following , but the defendant was driving very closely to the pursuit as it was nearing its end and the suspect was about to be apprehended. I don’t know why he was driving that closely to an active pursuit in the first place , but I do not think he was lost either.
BrandonBrandon
I don’t know if he was following , but the defendant was driving very closely to the pursuit as it was nearing its end and the suspect was about to be apprehended. I don’t know wh...
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:18 a.m.
How come the person in custody was the only person killed by CompetentCini?
ReapersReapers
How come the person in custody was the only person killed by CompetentCini?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 02:24 a.m.
Me and other law enforcement on scene were able to return fire and kill CompetentCini before he was able to kill more people after he out of nowhere reloaded his weapon and proceeded to shoot and kill Uhtraed( the person in custody).
BrandonBrandon
Me and other law enforcement on scene were able to return fire and kill CompetentCini before he was able to kill more people after he out of nowhere reloaded his weapon and proceed...
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:34 a.m.
Is it at all possible that Uhtraed was the only intended victim?
ReapersReapers
Is it at all possible that Uhtraed was the only intended victim?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 02:39 a.m.
It’s possible, but to me unlikely given the fact that the defendant continued shooting after Uhtraed was dead.
BrandonBrandon
It’s possible, but to me unlikely given the fact that the defendant continued shooting after Uhtraed was dead.
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:46 a.m.
Well, was anyone else hit?
ReapersReapers
Well, was anyone else hit?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 02:48 a.m.
I am unsure if anyone else was hit, I was not though
BrandonBrandon
I am unsure if anyone else was hit, I was not though
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 03:10 a.m.
Do you recognize this video? Exhibit (fail because I’m on phone)(edited)
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 03:13 a.m.
@Brandon Could you watch the video in Exhibit A of the prosecution’s discovery and tell us if you recognize it? (put it in chat too)
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 03:15 a.m.
Yes I do recognize this video https://youtu.be/3w9qFuXHRoQ?feature=shared
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 03:15 a.m.
@Reapers
BrandonBrandon
Yes I do recognize this video https://youtu.be/3w9qFuXHRoQ?feature=shared
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 03:16 a.m.
How do you recognize it?
ReapersReapers
How do you recognize it?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 03:17 a.m.
I am the one who took the video
BrandonBrandon
I am the one who took the video
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 03:19 a.m.
What are the events we see in this video?
ReapersReapers
What are the events we see in this video?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 03:51 a.m.
Me and other law enforcement are in our cars pursuing Uhtraed, who is driving a green lodger courier industrial.

The defendant is seen driving closely to the pursuit.

One or two of the green lodger courier industrials tires are popped already which causes Uhtraed who is driving it to finally stop driving , hop out of the car and try to escape into the defendants car, which the defendant drove a short distance ahead of the green lodger courier industrial.

When Uhtraed attempts to escape he gets into the defendants cars passenger seat. As soon as this happens the defendant gets out of the car and Uhtraed exits the passenger seat of the defendants car in which he is hit with a baton , causing him to fall , allowing for the other law enforcement on scene to successfully detain him.

After Uhtraed is detained , seconds later the defendant is seen a short distance ahead of their vehicle reloading their firearm, and then proceeds to shoot and kill Uhtraed. Then continuing to shoot a few shots afterwards.

Myself and the other law enforcement on duty return fire and kill the defendant.

I then go up to the defendants dead body and get positive confirmation that it is indeed CompetentCini via the “Search for ID” gui.
ReapersReapers
Then why would CompetentCini kill a person in police custody?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:06 a.m.
Objection
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:06 a.m.
Calls for speculation
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:06 a.m.
We move to strike the response too
ReapersReapers
Woodbury fields? That’s quite far from the city.. did Competent perhaps get lost or was he following the pursuit?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:06 a.m.
Objection
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:07 a.m.
Calls for speculation
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:07 a.m.
We move to strike the response too
ReapersReapers
Is it at all possible that Uhtraed was the only intended victim?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:07 a.m.
Objection
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:07 a.m.
Calls for speculation
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:07 a.m.
We move to strike the response too
ReapersReapers
@Brandon Could you watch the video in Exhibit A of the prosecution’s discovery and tell us if you recognize it? (put it in chat too)
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:07 a.m.
Objection, lack of foundation
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:07 a.m.
Evidence hasn't been introduced
ReapersReapers
Do you recognize this video? Exhibit (fail because I’m on phone)(edited)
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:34 a.m.
Objection, editing messages during questioning, have no clue what it originally said
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:34 a.m.
Counsel also asking two questions
ReapersReapers
@Brandon Where were you on March 26th?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:35 a.m.
Objection, lack of foundation, we wish to strike response too
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 08:35 a.m.
Actually, the entire line of questioning has no foundation whatsoever @meowiitten ,we wish to have it all stricken
huddy.huddy.
Calls for speculation
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:44 p.m.
The witness is competent to speculate the reasoning for the murder as a law enforcement officer, that’s part of his job
ReapersReapers
The witness is competent to speculate the reasoning for the murder as a law enforcement officer, that’s part of his job
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:45 p.m.
He is not here as an expert witness
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:45 p.m.
And even if he was called as an expert witness, he'd have to be an expert witness in criminal psychology
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:45 p.m.
You can't ask a lay witness to speculate a criminal's mind and reasoning
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:45 p.m.
@meowiitten
huddy.huddy.
Calls for speculation
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:45 p.m.
No speculation, as a witness, Brandon would know whether the defendant was there by mistake or on purpose
huddy.huddy.
Calls for speculation
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:46 p.m.
No speculation either, Brandon is an eyewitness who can testify to the amount of deaths by the defendant
ReapersReapers
No speculation, as a witness, Brandon would know whether the defendant was there by mistake or on purpose
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:47 p.m.
So if Brandon says the Defendant was there on purpose, and Defendant says he was there by mistake, who do we believe? The defendant commenting on his own state of mind, or an external lay witness commenting on the defendant's state of mind?
huddy.huddy.
Objection
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:47 p.m.
Sustained
ReapersReapers
No speculation either, Brandon is an eyewitness who can testify to the amount of deaths by the defendant
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:47 p.m.
'Intended'
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:47 p.m.
Lets not clog
huddy.huddy.
Objection, lack of foundation
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:47 p.m.
The whole line of questioning before it establishes Brandon as being a witness on scene, that is how evidence has been introduced
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:48 p.m.
You don’t need to ask for a response to be stricken
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:48 p.m.
If the objection is sustained then the answer is no longer evidence
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:48 p.m.
So don’t say that
huddy.huddy.
So if Brandon says the Defendant was there on purpose, and Defendant says he was there by mistake, who do we believe? The defendant commenting on his own state of mind, or an exter...
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:49 p.m.
Let’s put him on the stand and find out
huddy.huddy.
Objection
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:49 p.m.
Overruled
huddy.huddy.
Objection
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:49 p.m.
Overruled
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:49 p.m.
Overruled as to asking a lay witness what the Defendant intended in his mind to do??
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:50 p.m.
He’s asking a question based on his observable behavior
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:50 p.m.
I found the answer to be fine
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:51 p.m.
and the objections on the evidence not being properly introduced as well as a lack of foundation at the beginning of questioning?
huddy.huddy.
Objection, editing messages during questioning, have no clue what it originally said
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:51 p.m.
Overruled. He basically asked the same question twice
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:52 p.m.
No difference
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:52 p.m.
He responded once
huddy.huddy.
Actually, the entire line of questioning has no foundation whatsoever @meowiitten ,we wish to have it all stricken
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:53 p.m.
We can take that under advisement moving forward but all “backing up” would accomplish is like “what’s your name” and “where are you employed”
huddy.huddy.
Objection, lack of foundation
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:54 p.m.
It’s been introduced but the proper procedure is to ask me to admit it
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:54 p.m.
and perhaps in what capacity he was acting in on march 26
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:54 p.m.
So in fairness to both parties I will admit the clip in full for both of you to use
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:55 p.m.
@Reapers Are you finished?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
It’s been introduced but the proper procedure is to ask me to admit it
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:55 p.m.
I hadn’t finished authenticating it, your honor
ReapersReapers
I hadn’t finished authenticating it, your honor
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:56 p.m.
It’s authentic. I don’t see how you could forge that unless you used some very good AI
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:56 p.m.
It’s also an officer’s pov so it’s technically a “body cam” and self-authenticating
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:56 p.m.
Your Honor, without any context, would this look authentic?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:56 p.m.
Don’t be ridiculous
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 12:56 p.m.
Withdrawn, apologies
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:57 p.m.
@Reapers Are you done?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Reapers Are you done?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:59 p.m.
I have a few last questions, your honor
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 12:59 p.m.
Ok go
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 01:01 p.m.
@Brandon Since you said the defendant was shooting, how did you feel when you saw the defendant with a firearm out shooting?
ReapersReapers
@Brandon Since you said the defendant was shooting, how did you feel when you saw the defendant with a firearm out shooting?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 02:44 p.m.
I felt shocked because I thought he was just watching the scene as a bystander
BrandonBrandon
I felt shocked because I thought he was just watching the scene as a bystander
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:44 p.m.
Any other feeling?
ReapersReapers
Any other feeling?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 02:49 p.m.
Objection @meowiitten asked and answered
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 02:49 p.m.
First question already opened the response to multiple feelings
ReapersReapers
Any other feeling?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:50 p.m.
Withdrawn, my witness is a noob
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:51 p.m.
@huddy. @meowiitten No further questions for Brandon
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 02:52 p.m.
??
huddy.huddy.
??
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 02:52 p.m.
Are you gonna cross or what
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 02:52 p.m.
@huddy. proceed
ReapersReapers
Are you gonna cross or what
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 02:54 p.m.
No, I'm not going to randomly start crossing when the Judge hasn't allowed me to.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 02:54 p.m.
@Reapers Have you ever met Defendant in person before?
huddy.huddy.
@Reapers Have you ever met Defendant in person before?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 02:56 p.m.
Stay on task please
huddy.huddy.
@Reapers Have you ever met Defendant in person before?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 03:00 p.m.
I’m not the witness here, I think you meant to tag @Brandon
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Stay on task please
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 03:13 p.m.
Yeah oops pinged the wrong person
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 03:13 p.m.
@Brandon Howdy. Have you personally interacted with the Defendant in-game, prior to this incident?
huddy.huddy.
@Brandon Howdy. Have you personally interacted with the Defendant in-game, prior to this incident?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 03:16 p.m.
Not that I can remember no
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-05 03:23 p.m.
How often are you on-duty as a law enforcement officer?
huddy.huddy.
How often are you on-duty as a law enforcement officer?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 04:54 p.m.
Objection irrelevant and out of scope
ReapersReapers
Objection irrelevant and out of scope
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-05 05:07 p.m.
Overruled
huddy.huddy.
How often are you on-duty as a law enforcement officer?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-05 11:22 p.m.
I am usually on team for at least a few hours a week
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-06 11:50 a.m.
@Brandon How often do you witness murders in front of you?
huddy.huddy.
@Brandon How often do you witness murders in front of you?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-06 01:15 p.m.
A good amount due to there always being a moderate / high level of crime in populated Clark servers
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-06 01:17 p.m.
@Brandon How often do you witness murders of your detainees in front of you?
huddy.huddy.
@Brandon How often do you witness murders of your detainees in front of you?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-06 01:19 p.m.
A low amount, I’m usually able to get the detainee to a station or nobody comes and randomly kills my detainee
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-06 02:58 p.m.
@Brandon And what position did you hold in the MPD during the time of the incident?
huddy.huddy.
@Brandon And what position did you hold in the MPD during the time of the incident?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-06 03:03 p.m.
I’m not in MPD I’m MBI
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-06 03:04 p.m.
For MBI I am Agent in Training
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:04 p.m.
Mayflower Pureau of Dinvestigation
BrandonBrandon
For MBI I am Agent in Training
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:05 p.m.
When were you hired to the MBI?
huddy.huddy.
When were you hired to the MBI?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-06 03:06 p.m.
March 5th , 2025
BrandonBrandon
March 5th , 2025
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-06 03:08 p.m.
When did your probationary period start?
huddy.huddy.
When did your probationary period start?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-06 05:14 p.m.
The day I was hired
BrandonBrandon
The day I was hired
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 02:34 a.m.
Has it ended yet?
huddy.huddy.
Has it ended yet?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-07 01:32 p.m.
No
BrandonBrandon
No
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 01:33 p.m.
What are the terms of your probationary employment?
huddy.huddy.
What are the terms of your probationary employment?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-07 03:26 p.m.
@meowiitten Objection irrelevant and outside the scope
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:26 p.m.
Your Honor, I am establishing credibility of the witness and competence of his law enforcement duties
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-07 03:26 p.m.
Allow me some more questions to get to the point
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-07 03:27 p.m.
Overruled for now
huddy.huddy.
What are the terms of your probationary employment?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-07 11:25 p.m.
I believe it’s just like other agencies such as zero tolerance policy, etc . I’m not restricted from any ingame vehicles or anything or certain attire.
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-08 12:17 a.m.
If you want a little more insight into the regulations on probation , feel free to ask the Director
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-10 04:49 p.m.
@huddy. Are you done?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-11 03:40 a.m.
@Brandon Did you directly respond to Defendant's shots?
huddy.huddy.
@Brandon Did you directly respond to Defendant's shots?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-11 04:43 a.m.
Yes, I took out my firearm and fired shots back at the defendant after they took out their firearm killing Uhtraed .
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-13 02:28 a.m.
@meowiitten (Out of character)(Is this noob gonna keep asking 1 question a week)
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-13 07:39 a.m.
@Brandon How may shots did you fire at Defendant?
huddy.huddy.
@Brandon How may shots did you fire at Defendant?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-13 09:29 a.m.
1 bullet from my b17
BrandonBrandon
1 bullet from my b17
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-13 11:46 a.m.
How many shots did Defendant fire at you?
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:06 p.m.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-13 11:06 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @dero to the case channel.
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:10 p.m.
Hello your honor
derodero
Hello your honor
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
So I don't understand
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
Are you asking me to dismiss this case with prejudice
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Are you asking me to dismiss this case with prejudice
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
Yes your honor
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
Or just dismiss it otherwise
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
Would you have asked for without prejudice if this was pretrial
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
I would be entitled to dismiss it with prejudice at this stage
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
Regardless
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
I would have still requested prejudice. I do not want to bring this case back
derodero
I would have still requested prejudice. I do not want to bring this case back
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:19 p.m.
Why?
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:20 p.m.
Watse of resources
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:20 p.m.
Like many others
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:20 p.m.
I intend to clean up what we are spending our department's time on
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:22 p.m.
I understand that you are entitled to dismiss this case in any manner you want
derodero
I intend to clean up what we are spending our department's time on
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:24 p.m.
You are moving to dismiss other cases as well, I would assume?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
You are moving to dismiss other cases as well, I would assume?
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:24 p.m.
Yes your honor I intend to go through more thoroughly tomorrow and start dismissing other cases similar to this one
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:42 p.m.
Well
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:42 p.m.
I'll just say that the motion is denied
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:43 p.m.
@dero Thanks for trying
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:43 p.m.
And no, if I chose to dismiss I'd only be allowed to do so with prejudice
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
And no, if I chose to dismiss I'd only be allowed to do so with prejudice
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:43 p.m.
then why do it
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:44 p.m.
why not do it*
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:44 p.m.
I've explained this before
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:44 p.m.
I have an independent duty to ensure that justice be done
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:45 p.m.
I know and before you told me to do it like this with reasons why
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:45 p.m.
So unless the evidence in this case is falsified
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:45 p.m.
I did it right this time
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:45 p.m.
I totally don't understand why you'd drop a murder trial and call it waste
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:45 p.m.
What is your priority
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:45 p.m.
If anything at all
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:45 p.m.
how many times have you spawned in and just been murdered
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:46 p.m.
it happens every day
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:46 p.m.
murder is the new running a stop sign
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:46 p.m.
homicides like this are therefore not a priority as much as mass homicides or bombings
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-13 11:48 p.m.
I'd say something but I don't really know how to respond to that
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:48 p.m.
If this were real life of course this would be fully prosecuted
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:48 p.m.
but its roblox and murders have made their way down the list
dero
dero 2025-05-13 11:49 p.m.
im just trying to change how we do things so I figured you might be receptive if i asked super nicely
huddy.huddy.
How many shots did Defendant fire at you?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-14 02:45 a.m.
Well, anyways, do answer this question when you can @Brandon
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-14 02:51 a.m.
And I do wish to advise both the defense attorney and the defendant that if there has been any attempt to go over my head and communicate with the DOJ administration about the dismissal of this case for.. inappropriate reasons then you may very well be held in contempt here and liable for charges of obstruction of justice @CompetentCini @huddy.(edited)
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-14 03:09 a.m.
Bro think he the judge :💀:
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-14 03:09 a.m.
You are not very intimidating lil bro
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-14 03:12 a.m.
seems I was right
huddy.huddy.
You are not very intimidating lil bro
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-14 03:12 a.m.
It’s big bro to you and don’t try to match my aura lil bro
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-14 06:14 a.m.
lil bro that was not aura
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-14 06:15 a.m.
ur a level 1 grey prosecutor
ReapersReapers
And I do wish to advise both the defense attorney and the defendant that if there has been any attempt to go over my head and communicate with the DOJ administration about the dism...(edited)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 11:15 a.m.
@dero Maybe you can clear this up
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 11:15 a.m.
Because the onslaught of dismissals hasn’t quite happened yet
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 11:16 a.m.
And I am not inclined to dismiss
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 11:16 a.m.
Quite frankly
huddy.huddy.
How many shots did Defendant fire at you?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-14 11:54 a.m.
I don’t know the location of the defendants cursor in the video. He could’ve been aiming at me and fired, but missed horribly.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Because the onslaught of dismissals hasn’t quite happened yet
dero
dero 2025-05-14 03:42 p.m.
well you set the precedent that it wont fly so whatever
dero
dero 2025-05-14 03:43 p.m.
defendant was brand new to the game and has since gotten a LETI cert and a job as a DPS officer
dero
dero 2025-05-14 03:43 p.m.
this is like top 5 cases not worth prosecuting and ruining his career over
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:18 p.m.
@dero What case suggests I should let you dismiss
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:18 p.m.
For the reason of "waste of resources"(edited)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:18 p.m.
In the middle of trial
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@dero What case suggests I should let you dismiss
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:22 p.m.
theres no case saying you should let me dismiss this thats why its discretionary
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:22 p.m.
the doj should reward rehabilitation which is what im trying to do and this court should too
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:22 p.m.
he went on to be a successful police officer despite having this case against him
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:24 p.m.
the point is not to convince you on what legal standard urges you to dismiss. im just trying to tell you that the DOJ wants to prosecute gang members etc and we made a mistake filing this and we didnt see his efforts to change beforehand
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-14 05:24 p.m.
@meowiitten I plead to you your honor, I want nothing but to do good within the community and advance in the LEO space as random as this is I plead you for forgiveness and allow me to continue a lucrative career within the Department of State.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:25 p.m.
You will not speak
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:25 p.m.
@dero Is this part of a deal with the defendant?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:25 p.m.
Because there's seems to be some disconnect
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:25 p.m.
?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:25 p.m.
The actual prosecutor on this case, @Reapers, does not seem inclined to proceed with dismissal
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:26 p.m.
yes because hes been prosecuting it for a while
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:26 p.m.
this is my job as attorney general. I will not cater to what my prosecutor wants when it impedes what I believe to be the type of justice that should be sought
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:27 p.m.
and i mean that respectfully
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:27 p.m.
I believe that it is your job to determine the policy of the DOJ
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:28 p.m.
But I don't know if the policy of the DOJ aligns with my independent duty as a judge to further the interests of justice
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:28 p.m.
This specific policy
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:28 p.m.
Whatever it is
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:28 p.m.
right and I understand that
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:29 p.m.
its just that he wasnt a cop when we filed this and now that he is I believe it shows a genuine commitment to being a better citizen of mayflower
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:30 p.m.
And you would do this for anyone who is accused, key word accused, because no finding has been made yet... of murder and a series of other felonies... because they became a cop?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:30 p.m.
So you want people to go through the... alleged murderer to cop pipeline?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 05:30 p.m.
Is that right?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
And you would do this for anyone who is accused, key word accused, because no finding has been made yet... of murder and a series of other felonies... because they became a cop?
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:32 p.m.
I mean if someone committed a crime that is committed every minute on clark county then turned around and became a cop yes I would do the same thing
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:33 p.m.
if it were say.. treason then this would be a different story
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:34 p.m.
But i think its integral to remind this court that its not very often for someone to do something like this and then have the dedication to become a police officer
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:37 p.m.
if youre set on denying this then I wont bother this court any further but I just wanted to use my opportunity to make my arguments
dero
dero 2025-05-14 05:37 p.m.
i take my responsibility to administer justice very seriously, as do you, and so any chance I get I seize
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-14 07:03 p.m.
If what the attorney general said made sense, then what even is the entire point of the legal system, the department of justice and the courts(edited)
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-14 07:04 p.m.
if crime is to be accepted, then we may as well shut everything down
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-14 07:05 p.m.
The court has the discretion to dismiss the case but it should use its discretion wisely whilst taking into consideration the victims of the case and the people of mayflower as a whole, this is what precedent shows
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 08:12 p.m.
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
@Reapers @dero @huddy.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
huddy.huddy.
How many shots did Defendant fire at you?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-14 08:12 p.m.
Continue
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-14 08:24 p.m.
@Brandon ^
BrandonBrandon
I don’t know the location of the defendants cursor in the video. He could’ve been aiming at me and fired, but missed horribly.
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-14 08:26 p.m.
^
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-14 08:26 p.m.
@huddy.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-15 11:33 p.m.
@huddy. Continue
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-16 12:06 p.m.
@Brandon You previously testified that you had no prior interaction with the Defendant. Could you tell the court where you were approxomately 15 minutes prior to the incident?
huddy.huddy.
@Brandon You previously testified that you had no prior interaction with the Defendant. Could you tell the court where you were approxomately 15 minutes prior to the i...
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-16 02:21 p.m.
For a few min prior I know I was in the pursuit of Uhtraed. Don’t remember where I was before that tho .
BrandonBrandon
For a few min prior I know I was in the pursuit of Uhtraed. Don’t remember where I was before that tho .
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-17 01:49 p.m.
Were you on patrol?
huddy.huddy.
Were you on patrol?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-17 04:24 p.m.
Yes
BrandonBrandon
Yes
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-17 04:26 p.m.
Were you apprehending a suspect?
huddy.huddy.
Were you apprehending a suspect?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-17 04:27 p.m.
Before the situation with the defendant? I do not know
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-17 05:05 p.m.
@meowiitten Objection, your honor, the defense is asking irrelevant questions that are not leading to anything
ReapersReapers
@meowiitten Objection, your honor, the defense is asking irrelevant questions that are not leading to anything
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-17 05:06 p.m.
Overruled
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-19 03:38 p.m.
@Brandon Prior to your killing of Defendant, did you use your firearm in any way?
huddy.huddy.
@Brandon Prior to your killing of Defendant, did you use your firearm in any way?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-20 06:51 a.m.
Most likely, shootings happen a lot so I probably did get into some type of shootout
BrandonBrandon
Most likely, shootings happen a lot so I probably did get into some type of shootout
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-22 03:23 p.m.
Are you unable to certainly tell me?
huddy.huddy.
Are you unable to certainly tell me?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-22 08:07 p.m.
Yea because I do not remember
shah
shah 2025-05-23 09:43 a.m.
NOTICE OF REFERRAL TO STATE BAR

@Reapers

This notice is to formally inform you that, due to your continued failure to upload case-related documents via the required electronic terminal as stipulated in the Local Rules of this Court this matter will now be referred to the Mayflower State Bar for further review.

You were previously advised on the 22nd to submit the necessary filings through the proper system. To date, no satisfactory compliance has been recorded, and no reasonable justification has been provided.

Any matters in re this topic should now be addressed to the State Bar.

4/18 Affidavit of probable cause
4/24 Discovery

This notice is issued under the authority of Prothonotary Ashley Pueri.

Cc: All parties of record, State Bar
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 11:19 a.m.
@meowiitten Do we need to write a dismissal motion or will you just dismiss this
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 11:19 a.m.
seeing as this trial has been conducted with no valid AOPC or discovery on the record
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 11:19 a.m.
No probable cause has therefore been found
shahshah
NOTICE OF REFERRAL TO STATE BAR @Reapers This notice is to formally inform you that, due to your continued failure to upload case-related documents via the requ...
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-23 11:24 a.m.
Bullshit I received no such advise and if I’m being referred to the bar for this then why isn’t the defense attorney when his discovery (or anything else) is from him
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-23 11:25 a.m.
honestly if you want to kill the court system and disbar your last couple of practicing attorney for this shitty website then go ahead, we do not care(edited)
ReapersReapers
Bullshit I received no such advise and if I’m being referred to the bar for this then why isn’t the defense attorney when his discovery (or anything else) is from him
shah
shah 2025-05-23 11:25 a.m.
Mr Hamilton has also been referred to the State Bar in a different matter in conjunction to this matter. *See nickdestroyer13-v-hamilton--wexler-llp-and-jamesmhamilton *
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-23 11:26 a.m.
Well if hamilton has been referred then no harm no foul
shah
shah 2025-05-23 11:27 a.m.
The advice was posted on court-announcements which was an @/everyone announcement.
shahshah
Mr Hamilton has also been referred to the State Bar in a different matter in conjunction to this matter. *See nickdestroyer13-v-hamilton--wexler-llp-and-jamesmhamilton *
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 11:31 a.m.
What's this got to do with me?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 11:32 a.m.
@meowiitten We have begun a fraudulent and false trial based on a case which has not been found to have probable cause as no AOPC was submitted, and the majority of facts have been based upon Exhibit A which should not be allowed during testimony due to a lack of discovery
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 11:32 a.m.
Therefore, we move for the court to dismiss the case in its entirety
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 11:32 a.m.
There was discovery
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 11:32 a.m.
This is a clerical issue if anything
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
This is a clerical issue if anything
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:26 p.m.
The fellow has just told the court that the State never filed an AOPC or Discovery - they just sent the file in this chat
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:26 p.m.
The website is the official record of files
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:26 p.m.
Otherwise it wouldn't be required
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 12:37 p.m.
I have the discovery pinned
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 12:37 p.m.
Its on my record
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:47 p.m.
@shah Thank you for your absolutely useless announcement then
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:47 p.m.
may I continue questioning then?
huddy.huddy.
@shah Thank you for your absolutely useless announcement then
shah
shah 2025-05-23 12:49 p.m.
You will be referred further
huddy.huddy.
may I continue questioning then?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-23 12:50 p.m.
Continue questioning (boy)
shahshah
You will be referred further
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:51 p.m.
I will be referred further?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:52 p.m.
You just told the court that the State's filings are not official
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:52 p.m.
and the Judge just said they are
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:52 p.m.
and the Judge has the final word
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:52 p.m.
so your statement is therefore useless
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 12:52 p.m.
not that I have anything to do with it
shah
shah 2025-05-23 12:52 p.m.
Stop disrupting the official court transcript. If you have something to say, say it in attorney-lounge .
shah
shah 2025-05-23 12:52 p.m.
Cc: @Doogy
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-23 02:59 p.m.
By the time this court session ends I’ll probably be done with the State Trooper Academy in real life. Holy this is getting pointless. This isn’t some serious matter you had so many opportunities to drop this silly case that is pointless. I just wanted to enjoy the game before im completely gone(edited)
CompetentCiniCompetentCini
By the time this court session ends I’ll probably be done with the State Trooper Academy in real life. Holy this is getting pointless. This isn’t some serious matter you had so man...(edited)
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-23 03:22 p.m.
Your attorney is the only one delaying the case
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-23 03:22 p.m.
@meowiitten I suggest holding an ingame session for questioning otherwise we will be held hostage here forever
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 03:25 p.m.
@huddy. Are you done with your questions
ReapersReapers
@meowiitten I suggest holding an ingame session for questioning otherwise we will be held hostage here forever
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 03:29 p.m.
I was going to get ingame for this but I just got assaulted and killed
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 03:29 p.m.
In the supreme court building
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-23 03:30 p.m.
lol
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-23 03:31 p.m.
Yea next month I’ll be gone until 2026 I’ll be playing weekends only this is so retarded lol I got rejected from MNG MP and MSP because of this case, would have gotten into both easily.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-23 04:16 p.m.
We have no further questions.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 04:38 p.m.
@Reapers @huddy. Any witnesses to call?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Reapers @huddy. Any witnesses to call?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-23 04:41 p.m.
No, your honor
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Reapers @huddy. Any witnesses to call?
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-24 04:09 a.m.
We call Defendant Competentcini to the stand
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-24 10:06 a.m.
@CompetentCini Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@CompetentCini Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-24 01:36 p.m.
Yes
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-24 01:37 p.m.
@huddy. Go
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-24 02:28 p.m.
@CompetentCini
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-24 02:28 p.m.
Please state your name for the record.
huddy.huddy.
Please state your name for the record.
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-24 03:29 p.m.
CompetentCini
CompetentCiniCompetentCini
CompetentCini
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-24 04:19 p.m.
And what is your relation to this case?
huddy.huddy.
And what is your relation to this case?
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-24 05:01 p.m.
Simply being at a scene at the wrong time
CompetentCiniCompetentCini
Simply being at a scene at the wrong time
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-25 02:14 p.m.
Are you the Defendant in this case?
huddy.huddy.
Are you the Defendant in this case?
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-25 02:31 p.m.
Yes.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-27 03:27 p.m.
Long ahh sleep
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-27 03:27 p.m.
@CompetentCini Where were you on March 26th?
huddy.huddy.
@CompetentCini Where were you on March 26th?
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-28 08:01 p.m.
I was at several POIs on that day
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 07:01 p.m.
@huddy. I'm going to waive your examination if you keep running away every time he responds
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 10:23 p.m.
@Reapers Do you plan to call another witness after this?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 10:25 p.m.
@CompetentCini
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Reapers Do you plan to call another witness after this?
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-29 11:10 p.m.
No
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-29 11:10 p.m.
this has been going on for ages, can we wrap it up
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 11:15 p.m.
@CompetentCini Do you want to give a brief statement to the court
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 11:15 p.m.
@Reapers Do you object to this
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 11:15 p.m.
Since his lawyer isn't asking him questions
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 11:16 p.m.
He has a right to testify so that's why I am allowing this
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 11:16 p.m.
Its extraordinary but
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Reapers Do you object to this
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-29 11:39 p.m.
I don't object
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 11:44 p.m.
@CompetentCini you have 24 hours to make a short statement to the court, if any, since your lawyer can't keep up with the timelines
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-29 11:45 p.m.
You may waive if you wish
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-30 08:22 a.m.
im waiving nothing to say
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-30 08:26 a.m.
except brandon only reported this due to the positions i was in, if i was any known or had a list of crimes on my record he wouldn't have reported, this is a great way to drive people away from the game. This was the only incident ive had in the game, bringing a case that happen a month prior(edited)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 10:53 a.m.
Alright
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 10:54 a.m.
@huddy. closing statement please if you have no other witnesses
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 10:54 a.m.
24 hours
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-30 10:54 a.m.
Thanks
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 07:25 p.m.
@huddy.
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 12:01 p.m.
Apologies for the wait, unprecedentedly busy irl.

Your Honor, this is not a regular case of a criminal committing murder without repercussions. This is the case of a hard-working Defendant who previously made several mistakes, however has since began working for the state and left his past behind, contributing daily to the people of Mayflower in his roles in the State Department and Aviation Authority. As the Attorney General himself outlined, the Justice Department recognises that this form of prosecution against redemptional individuals is wrong, and thus we ask that you be the first Judge to set landmark precedent by finding the Defendant not-guilty due to his change in his way of life, and the destruction that a guilty verdict would bring.

Thank you.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 12:17 p.m.
@Reapers
Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-31 03:36 p.m.
Your honor,
after getting to know the defendant more throughout this case, I truly do feel sorry for him. However, the fact of the matter remains that the defendant did kill a man who was in police custody to prevent his arrest by the authorities. This is behavior that is simply unbecoming of a government employee or an aspiring law enforcement officer. This was not just a random attack from the likes of which happen constantly on Clark County, this was targeted attack meant to prevent justice. While doing so, he put the lives of the officers on scene in danger as he did not stop firing once the detainee was dead, which could mean he intended to kill them as well had they not taken him down first. You can clearly see particles bouncing off the officer's body in the video which indicate that some bullets did indeed land on him. Therefore, while I do not mind a lenient sentence for the defendant, justice must still be served and the victims avenged. Thank you.
@meowiitten @huddy.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 03:37 p.m.
Alright, the case will be submitted for a verdict
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 03:37 p.m.
I will deliberate
huddy.
huddy. 2025-05-31 03:37 p.m.
Thank you
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:52 p.m.
@Reapers @huddy. @CompetentCini I have reached a verdict!
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:54 p.m.
Mr. CompetentCini,

I have reviewed the charges laid against you and the corresponding verdicts as rendered. I will now read each count and my decision into the record:
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:54 p.m.
Count 1 – Murder in the First Degree:
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:54 p.m.
Verdict: Guilty.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:54 p.m.
Count 2 – Murder in the Second Degree (Lesser Included Offense):
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:54 p.m.
No adjudication made, as a verdict was returned on the greater offense.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:54 p.m.
Count 3 – Attempted Murder:
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
Verdict: Guilty.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
Count 4 – Aggravated Battery:
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
Verdict: Guilty.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
Count 5 – Assault with a Deadly Weapon:
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
Verdict: Guilty.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
Count 6 – Obstruction of Justice:
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
Verdict: Guilty.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
These verdicts have been duly entered into the record as of today, May 31st, 2025.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:55 p.m.
Sentencing will be released shortly.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 06:56 p.m.
VERDICT SHEET
@Reapers @huddy. @CompetentCini
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:22 p.m.
Mr. CompetentCini,(edited)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:22 p.m.
You have been found guilty by this Court on the following counts as charged in the Information filed on April 18th, 2025:
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:23 p.m.
- Count 1 – First-Degree Murder
- Count 3 – Attempted Murder
- Count 4 – Aggravated Battery
- Count 5 – Assault with a Deadly Weapon
- Count 6 – Obstruction of Justice
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:23 p.m.
As to Count 2 – Second-Degree Murder, the Court makes no adjudication, and it is hereby dismissed.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:23 p.m.
Accordingly, it is the judgment of this Court that you, CompetentCini, are hereby sentenced to serve five hundred and nineteen (519) minutes in the custody of the Mayflower Department of Corrections. You are to be remanded immediately into the custody of the County Sheriff to begin serving this sentence.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:23 p.m.
In addition, you are hereby permanently prohibited from possessing, shipping, transporting, or receiving any firearms or ammunition, unless and until this conviction is expunged, in accordance with 4 M.S.C. 5 § 4903.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:23 p.m.
Furthermore, you are prohibited from obtaining or maintaining peace officer status until July 20th, 2025, under 4 M.S.C. 5 § 1602.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:23 p.m.
Lastly, you shall be eligible to apply for expungement of this conviction on January 31st, 2026, as provided under 5 M.S.C. 1 § 1503.1.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:23 p.m.
This sentence is now entered into the record as of May 31st, 2025.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:24 p.m.
May God have mercy on your soul.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:24 p.m.
This court is adjourned!
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:25 p.m.
MINUTE ENTRY: Sentencing held on 05/31/2025 before Judge sadoimpacto as to CompetentCini (1): Counts 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Defendant sentenced to Five Hundred Nineteen (519) Minutes of Incarceration; Fifty (50) Days of Disqualification from Peace Officer Status Pursuant to 4 M.S.C. § 1601(d); Permanent Prohibition on the Possession, Shipment, Transport, or Receipt of Firearms or Ammunition Pursuant to 4 M.S.C. 5 § 4903; and Eight (8) Months of Delayed Expungement Eligibility Pursuant to 5 M.S.C. § 1503.1.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:26 p.m.
COURT JUDGMENT
@Reapers @huddy. @CompetentCini
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:27 p.m.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 07:28 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 07:28 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 07:28 p.m.
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-31 07:29 p.m.
8 months for a expundgement?(edited)
CompetentCini
CompetentCini 2025-05-31 07:29 p.m.
yea dude im not playing this game ever again coming for ppl who actually wanted to do something(edited)
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
COURT JUDGMENT @Reapers @huddy. @CompetentCini
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:30 p.m.
@Prothonotary's Office Please archive and deliver a copy of the judgment forthwith to (1) the Law Enforcement Training Institute, and (2) the Division of Public Safety for enforcement of condition 2.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-31 07:30 p.m.
@Brenda
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 07:44 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @CompetentCini from the case channel.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 07:44 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @Fish from the case channel.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 07:44 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @huddy. from the case channel.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 07:44 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @Reapers from the case channel.
BrendaBrenda used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-01 08:01 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-01 08:01 a.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-01 08:01 a.m.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-06-01 05:17 p.m.
The judgment has been served upon Isanwz and ISpilledMyTacos
Exported 520 messages